Category Archives: Business and Law

Birkbeck alumni welcome new international students

Over 50 new international students met with Birkbeck alumni at the International Alumni Friendship Scheme reception on Friday 4 October.

International alumni event

Birkbeck offers a buddy scheme for new international students whereby they can meet with successful alumni who can offer invaluable advice to the new cohort. Starting university can be a daunting challenge for anyone. Starting a university in a foreign country, however, poses many other difficult challenges that can seem overwhelming at first. Many of the international students who attended the reception have been in the UK for less than a fortnight, making the pairing up of students with Birkbeck alumni vital in enabling the new international cohort to settle into their new life in London.

Tricia King, Pro-Vice-Master for Student Experience and Director of External Relations at Birkbeck, gave a warm welcome to the new students, highlighting the world-class teaching that the College provides. She also spoke of the opportunities that graduating from Birkbeck can lead to, stating: “We are an institution that continues to be in the top one percent of the world’s universities and our graduates have the highest graduate starting salaries of any university in the UK.”

Students asked a wide variety of questions to Birkbeck alumni – anything from general course enquiries and advice about future careers to what actually is an Oyster Card! The evening is only the start of these new friendships; alumni and students will continue to meet up over the coming months to help students settle into Birkbeck and London life.

Student workshop: engaging with the HR profession

Students studying the MSc Human Resource Development and Consultancy recently had the opportunity to participate in a workshop focusing on the transition from their studies and onto the next stage of their careers in Human Resources. In addition to a number of informational sessions, the day included two visiting speaker sessions. In the morning we were privileged to welcome James Davies, a partner and joint head of the Employment, Reward and Immigration Department of Lewis Silkin LLP. James is recognised as one of the leading employment lawyers both in the UK and internationally by a range of independent guides.

In the afternoon, we held a panel session based on the “Question Time” format. We were delighted that Tony Leahy, (Head of Human Resources & Communications, Bank of Cyprus UK); Rob Griffiths, (Sales and Marketing Director, Exemplas); Gordon D’Silva, (Social Entrepreneur) and Sian Grinter (Group Financial Controller at James Hambro and Partners LLP) were able to join us for this session – a broad range of senior professionals with an impressive range of business experience who could each bring different perspectives to a debate on the role of HR – and HR roles – in contemporary organizations. They fielded a huge range of questions from the students and provided some very thought provoking responses.

We are hugely grateful to all our guest speakers and panelists at this event for giving their time to engage with our students. This was our final workshop session with those students completing their MSc HRD and Consultancy this year. As always, it will be sad to see them leave but I have no doubt they are destined for great things.

Dr Katrina Pritchard
MSc HRD and Consultancy, Programme Director

Employment legislation and the internationalization of Human Resources Management (HRM): A reflective perspective.
By Obi Aguiyi

A brief but engaging session with Jamie Davies of Lewin Silkin LLP provided valuable insight into current international human resources management (IHRM) trends and broader socio-political changes in employment law legislation, particularly in Europe. It is evident that the EU has had a massive influence over employment law rights, and several changes have been made to British legislation to comply with European employment laws. EU employment law rights continue to influence issues in discrimination law, from unfair dismissals to maximum weekly working hours. Most importantly, recent developments in unfair dismissal legislation, data protection issues and increasing emphasis on business ethics continue to pose considerable challenges to most global organizations as they continue to transcend national borders.

As an aspiring HR practitioner in a globalised world, one cannot underestimate the ways wider socio-political and economic factors continue to influence the manner in which HR professionals operate. The session provided an understanding of the relationship between changing trends in employment relations and the role of HR in enhancing employment law practices in today’s world. Furthermore, recent socio-economic changes may drive HR practitioners to play a more active role in the way employment issues are addressed and reformed (where required). As organizations and governments continue to seek microeconomic reforms, particularly in European countries, similar attention must be paid to wider global employment and legislative issues as all industrialized nations approach a common level of growth and emerging countries are likely to converge toward the same level of income as more developed nations. Similarly, politicians and law makers must endeavor to make sound decisions on employment issues and support HR practices in general.

Question Time at Birkbeck for MSc HRD and Consultancy Student
By Craig Fergusson

The panel discussion was an opportunity to get real-life perspectives on the HR function from some highly-respected business people. We’ve spent the past year backing up our experience as practitioners with theory, and here we had on-the-ground reports about the challenges and opportunities facing HR practitioners. While some of the dialogue reinforced the academic learning, there were some real points of contention where practical application seemed to be falling short. The panel was very honest about how they envisaged the value that HR could add and where they felt its limitations were. I suppose what was invigorating for me was being able to appreciate an argument while disagreeing and, more importantly, being able to articulate (to myself at least) why I was disagreeing.

Gaining insight into how senior business people think about HR, and how they discuss it among themselves (and quite often argue different viewpoints) was a lesson for the future in dealing with senior management. If HR is to increase its credibility as a business function worthy of a board presence we have to learn to answer our critics, address their concerns about efficacy and demonstrate our value. If a reasonably sympathetic panel can provide so much food for thought it demonstrates what we can expect to face in the boardroom.

Interestingly, one panel member pointed out that they felt their successful engagement with people was precisely because they weren’t HR – the implication being that HR was on the side of the management and therefore not to be trusted. This was an interesting reminder that while there is clearly a strategic management angle to the function, HR departments have an ambiguous role.

Finally, the session was another reminder of the value of interacting with others and harvesting differing viewpoints. While we might not always like what some people have to say, or the arguments they make, a head-in-the-sand approach is not going to progress anything. People will still have those views whether we listen to them or not, and at least if we hear them we have a chance to challenge them, discuss why they think like that, and perhaps refine our own understanding to incorporate new learning. We assume we’re right until someone shows us otherwise – it’s important to give them that opportunity.

Meeting people from diverse backgrounds and sharing [arguing!] with them has been so much part of the learning experience during the MSc HRD and Consultancy at Birkbeck. By that measure, the panel session was an extension of that general approach.

[iframe src=”https://bloomsbury.mediacore.tv/media/op-hrm-panel/embed_player?iframe=True” width=”560″ height=”315″]

New Foundations: Re-designing the Academic Stage of Legal Training

This post was contributed by Joanna Hartl, a first-year student on Birkbeck’s three-year LLB.

Day three of Law on Trial made me think:  “Why do lawyers spend so much time arguing ?” The answer is obvious: “Because they can’t help it!” Besides which –  how do you define an argument? Is it a heated discussion, or just people who have different views, perhaps the word “debate” would be better. Or is it because in the heart of every lawyer there lies the innate desire to always challenge the person with the opposing viewpoint, yes perhaps there we have it! The adversarial technique… is it genetically inherited? /environmentally cultivated? /developed through peer pressure? /caught like a virus? / or does it infect you like a Trojan Worm, so that once it has got itself into your system, it seems to be self-perpetuating forever and ever? A lawyer’s lot is not a happy one it seems, when they are studying or teaching something which they would rather not be.

The Alternative Law Degree

I thought I was already following a pretty alternative course. Since coming to Birkbeck I seem to have spent more time studying history, politics, economics and the welfare state, than it seems I have spent on studying the law itself, but then the law is purely a product of all those anyway. I don ‘t know about anyone else, but I think I ‘m already on the Alternative Law Degree. So at the end I may well end up getting an LLA (LLAlternativa!) But to be honest with you, I have totally enjoyed myself in the process, and like somebody said tonight, no one has yet dared to actually lay down what categorically comprises the content material/exact syllabus of the core subjects. We ‘re all going to be happy with “violence” and “environment” instead of criminal and land law.  In any case, it’s only the words you choose to define things. The things you are defining will still be there, whatever words you use. Your job as teachers is to instill in the student the ability to think critically, and for this Birkbeck deserves a FIRST PRIZE and a GOLD STAR. Education is not about just getting a first,  it’s also about discovering your own abilities and developing them, in order to change society, and I think that Birkbeck is doing its level best to make that happen.

Legal Education: Socialist Survivors

This post was contributed by Joanna Hartl, a first-year student on Birkbeck’s three-year LLB.

On the second day of Law On Trial, things livened up a bit, with quite a lot of audience participation. Professor Bill Bowring chaired the panel, consisting of two young, dynamic and recently qualified lawyers, Stephen and Natalie. Both gave excellent punchy presentations, putting their point across as Socialist Lawyers, and trying to show that the Legal Education System which exists in the Northern Hemisphere is very much supporting the continuity of the established capitalist status quo. The inadequacies and irrelevancy of the professional training courses necessary to practise law in the UK i.e. the B.P.T.C and the L.P.C were highlighted, and the cost of the B.P.T.C. in particular was seen as prohibitive to the majority of those present, so much so that one aspiring young lawyer has already decided to continue her studies in Nigeria, where the whole course equivalent to the B.P.T.C. costs only £4000 and no pupillage is required. Dr Oscar Guardiola-Rivera was happy that such an interchange should take place, but the student felt that it was for the wrong reasons, as it was not an economic option for her to continue in the UK! As well as highlighting the plight of individual impoverished Law students, and their fight for the right to continue their studies amidst continuing funding difficulties and  economic barriers; other key areas were also explored, which are of current topical and political interest, in particular the government’s legal aid cuts, and the pending impact this will have on many high street law firms. It will mean closure for many, as well as an end to the funding of neighbourhood law centres. Strike action was encouraged, which has already taken place, with both barristers and solicitors on strike against Legal Aid Cuts. We were exhorted to sign the petition against the cuts, which is called “saveukjustice”, and to join The Haldane Society, which is open to anyone interested in Law (you don’t need to be a qualified lawyer) and Socialism. The ideas of Peter Kropotkin were espoused by Stephen, and women were encouraged by Natalie to read the book by Baroness Helena Kennedy ” Eve Was Framed “, which will form the subject of discussion of a reading group at the Haldane Society. The evening was rounded off by Bill Bowring with a call to the Bar (on the 4th floor) for anyone wishing to continue the lively discussion. It was an extremely thought provoking, and stimulating evening, and well worth the effort of attending. I wil certainly be there again tomorrow!